From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Aug 13 17:50:21 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F069149
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6806F27E9
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:50:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so96534pad.10
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=VgIZY1qKBQYcSgeyquG/0wg3CnhosM/F/smbPQmDehw=;
 b=hEOn6xJ7cUg8CSBUCF2m8ZDeR2YG/Fv8D1pk0l9PhVLy7FKr50BH6AyP7xEN3cUAsK
 BBS8exWS6msZ22mjjdnKnN9ffbdLFTV96HHlIJ1SzRVAZMGdd5CUv4CNVTOVbXatte/q
 lXDRa4g30rwxSsKLo6UETZ/YpTPb8ffIjCbZK+dVqlyh1GantCtNx0wp5n758v4eL9ji
 Eu1m7swjiBzMnwUnoYrzpq6KmoHY9OMKfmb0GY8h1W0hA5YfrVU2h3gThjTFrC0T2RhR
 1gceg93xTmx2LV86JMEtMcn9X4OaFTAd0tZI7nabqHBhRitvgVgR85XNb+xIRakY7Fog
 tKRQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.150.5 with SMTP id ue5mr5110865pab.129.1407952221037;
 Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.118.132 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it>
References: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:50:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+tpaK0+YnEzagH--VnyNqpYArH2eVnmVhQEcR3ST8yYtRJZ+w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NAT question
From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To: Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:50:21 -0000

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it
> wrote:

>
> Hello, I'm still migrating machines from linux to FreeBSD. I'm wondering if
> my translation from this iptables linux rule
>
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.7.234/32 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -o
> eth1 -j
> MASQUERADE
>
> (which means moreless if Mr 192.168.7.234 wherever he comes fom passes
> through our eth1 interface to go to 172.16.1 network should get our
> eth1 address instead of his)
>
> is moreless correctly translated in FreeBSD ipnat rules as
>
> map em0 192.168.7.234/32 -> 0/32
>
> or I'm missing something?


You might want to use a more integrated and supported FW such as IPFW or PF
to do NAT.



-- 
Adam