From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 11 15:33:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4558737B401 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-107-97.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.107.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80CC643F75 for ; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:33:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D69A66BE5; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 130877A8; Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:33:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Hoskins Message-ID: <20030811223323.GA43868@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030811133749.U27196@fubar.adept.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030811133749.U27196@fubar.adept.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: realpath(3) et al X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:33:25 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:08:27PM -0700, Mike Hoskins wrote: > My question is... If enabling a 3rd-party audit for some target release > (5.3+ I'd assume) is desirable, what would be needed money-, time- and > other-wise? I'm willing to invest both time and money to make this > happen. I'd expect such an endeavor to be tedious and expensive... and, > of course, it would really need to be repeated occasionally to be of real > value. (Probably, at least, after major version number changes.) > However, perhaps doing an audit of the base system now would help our > image in the security community? Help with auditing is always welcomed. See the freebsd-audit mailing list. Kris --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/OBmzWry0BWjoQKURAhUkAKC9LP+td0lASSNE/GkKnbM8NZ/CoQCfYC9c JuC+knGcUSiSC9+qwOBkDHE= =dgx+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--