Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:07:20 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: blocksshd Message-ID: <20070311220720.GA85327@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <45F45C11.6040302@forrie.com> References: <45F45C11.6040302@forrie.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> The entire distribution seems to have ^M (suggesting it came from a
> different editor), FYI.
>
> I don't see mention of a table to use in the blocksshd.conf file... does
> this presume that the host system isn't using other tables?
>
> Is this being defined by:
>
> my ($exists) = system("$cfg->{pfctl} -t $cfg->{chain} -T show| grep -q
> '$IP'"); ^M
>
> $cfg->{chain}
I noticed this the other day myself. The port needs USE_DOS2UNIX=yes in
the Makefile, which should fix the main script itself, but probably not
the configuration files.
One thing worth pondering: why on earth would a piece of software
intended solely for *IX machines have carriage returns in it? It
doesn't give me a "good feeling" about the origins of the program...
As far as the pf tables go, out-of-the-box it doesn't use any. See
above, re: "good feeling".
--
| Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070311220720.GA85327>