From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 17:52:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB941065672 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA53D8FC20 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-255-48-78.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.48.78]:58509 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1MWw22-0001K2-4t for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:36:40 +0200 Received: (qmail 56320 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2009 19:36:36 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2009 19:36:36 +0200 Received: (qmail 76390 invoked by uid 1001); 31 Jul 2009 19:36:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:36:36 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: "Jason J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <20090731173636.GA76357@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090731121249.538ea7e7.jasonh@DataIX.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.48.78 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1MWw22-0001K2-4t. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1MWw22-0001K2-4t b8c2c9caf98c144677615189d547866b Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/*/jpeg "Thanks a lot guys" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:52:13 -0000 On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:12:49PM -0400, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote: > > Now that I have finally upgraded my system in full from the last mix-up > with jpeg, You guys have bumped up every PORTREVISION that depends on jpeg > "Great real great" Now I get to spend another three days fixing up some > more packages and rebuilding about 800+ ports. > > Thanks a whole lot. Nobody is forcing you to rebuild your ports just because the PORTREVISION was bumped. If everything works fine for you there is actually no good reason at all to do so. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se