Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:00:08 -0800 (PST) From: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option In-Reply-To: <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk> References: <D029D964D3A96A570922090C@ogg.in.absolight.net> <ee422bd630292fe6f7bc5439799667de@lhaven.homeip.net> <2A3ABE9AE68B3CE8E1B7C1A1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20150113163324.299F27E9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150114080033.GE33449@droso.dk> <20150114153427.63AD7C0A@hub.freebsd.org> <54B696BF.5020901@FreeBSD.org> <20150114163443.280B1ED9@hub.freebsd.org> <20150115084803.GM33449@droso.dk>
| previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This sounds like you, like many other people have done in the past, have > built an in-house solution based on the tools available at the time, > which includes 'make package' I wouldn't call it an in-house solution since the package target is a feature of the ports infrastructure. We simply 'make package' and install other systems from the resulting package. This does not, however, appear to be as well supported by portsng/pkgng as it was in the previous versions. Now it just exits with no message and a 0 exit-code without creating the package unless you've created /usr/ports/packages and/or specified one or more of WRKDIRPREFIX, PACKAGES and PKGREPOSITORY. What documentation there is seems to be based on older versions (like much of the FreeBSD website) and I haven't found anything on the differences between 'make package' and Poudriere. Roger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?>