Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Apr 1995 19:01:38 +0200
From:      Andres Vega Garcia <Andres.Vega_Garcia@sophia.inria.fr>
To:        questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bug in 3c509 driver? 
Message-ID:  <199504101701.TAA09897@tic.inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: your message of Fri, 07 Apr 1995 20:29:00 PDT.

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From: Bill Heiser <heiser>
>Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
>Subject: FreeBSD as a GATEWAY, but NOT a ROUTER
>Date: 7 Apr 1995 16:28:58 GMT
>Organization: Equipment Division, Raytheon Company
>Lines: 29
>Message-ID: <3m3p8a$brh@news.ed.ray.com>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: spc280.ed.ray.com
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>NNTP-Posting-User: heiser
>X-Disclaimer: This is the author's opinion and not that of Raytheon Company.
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1b2 (X11; I; Linux 1.2.0 i486)
>X-URL: news:comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc#3m2r7g$la6@bonnie.tcd-dresden.de
>Xref: agate comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:703
>
>I have configured a FreeBSD machine with two 3c509 network cards so that
>I can use the machine as a gateway between two networks.  I have NOT
>enabled the GATEWAY option in the kernel, because I do NOT want packet
>forwarding to take place.  I simply want the machine to be able to
>be directly connected to the two networks.
>
>What I am finding is that I can talk to the primary interface,
>but not the secondary.  I know both cards work because I have tried
>reversing their roles - and both work as the primary interface.
>The setup is as follows:
>
>            gateway                isolated host
>  ----------XXXXXX-----------------XXXXXXXX
>   primary             subnet
>   network
>
>When I try to talk to (i.e. Ping) the isolated host, ping tells me that
>the remote host is down (i.e. ping returns -1).
>
>Has anyone else configured FreeBSD in this type of arrangement, i.e. has
>anyone built a firewall or gateway type of arrangement with this setup?

	In 1.1.5.1 I had 3 3c509 in different sub-nets, I had compiled with
the GATEWAY option.

	In 2.0R I don't have the GATEWAY option. I have just 2 3c509
configured and I don't have any problems to see the hosts on each side.

>I have checked the FAQ and found nothing applicable.  It talks about 
>enabling the GATEWAY option in the kernel, but again, I don't want 
>packet forwarding to occur between the networks.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>Bill
>

	How have you configured the (both) cards?
 
	Can you ping the interface itself?
Andres

------------------------------
INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, France
      avega@pax.inria.fr



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504101701.TAA09897>