From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 00:09:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D723916A420; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 00:09:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C92C43D62; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 00:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E03215DB85; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:07:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ps@mu.org Delivered-To: ps@mu.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C8C5C9BB for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:28:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A90555FD; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46B816A4D8; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:35 +0000 (GMT) Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A1C16A4D0; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F4F43D48; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9782D65339; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 51672-01; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (dhcp120.icir.org [192.150.187.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00006530A; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 03:28:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A0A436482; Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:28:17 -0800 (PST) From: Bruce M Simpson To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20041112032817.GB7195@dhcp120.icir.org> Mail-Followup-To: Brooks Davis , Max Laier , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org References: <200411112124.12616.max@love2party.net> <20041112031318.GC1809@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041112031318.GC1809@odin.ac.hmc.edu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on elvis.mu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Max Laier , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: in.c autoadding prefix route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:09:35 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:28:17 -0800 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:09:35 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 07:13:18PM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > I have no objections so this change. Does this help or hurt our quest > to be able to usefully bind to 0.0.0.0? It would be really nice if we > could eventually do this so we could stop running bpf on 90+% of all > machines just so we could use DHCP. Nope, that's a job for my IP_SENDIF change (as yet unimplemented). This change, however, may make things somewhat easier for interfaces configured with the same broadcast address; IP_ONESBCAST currently relies on the fact that an interface is numbered and has a network broadcast address to do what it does, but I can see that changing or perhaps even becoming obsolete if IP_SENDIF is implemented. It's a trivial change to implement SO_BINDTODEVICE on top for Linux compatibility. Regards, BMS --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: '' iD8DBQFBlC3RueUpAYYNtTsRAiiDAJwMwK5OhSdsz50ahK5KQQ3ls2m/6gCeJPun /VC+Qe3JIrNyYPYv6NFROAo= =ctzK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--