Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:49:28 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <525364A8.6020300@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <CAF6rxgkmfMmOqz1%2BbaG1_REkUVtX8COcukcPg%2BkVtcOQ9L023A@mail.gmail.com> <20131007150658.GA79233@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <52534B5E.7010401@freebsd.org> <20131008002854.GB56872@funkthat.com> <525354C2.8070807@m5p.com> <20131008013350.GB31261@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 08:41:38PM -0400, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 10/07/13 20:28, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote this message on Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:01 +0800: >>>> not a big thing but I believe that a lot of poeple use ci/co on /etc >>>> becasue it is "just there" >>> +1 >>> >> Folks, this is just plain a major violation of the Principle of Least >> Amazement. RCS is ideal for keeping track of my configuration files >> in /etc. What do we gain by removing it? > Less GPL code in FreeBSD? not a problem unless you plan in shipping a changed version of it on your product??
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?525364A8.6020300>