From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 30 17:44:15 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056FE106567E;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:44:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4B23CF4F;
	Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:44:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E5D216C.6070801@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:44:12 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110805 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
References: <201108300823.p7U8NIfD038098@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4E5CC44C.3070604@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110830111152.GF28186@home.opsec.eu>
	<4E5CD28A.1080809@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110830122726.GG28186@home.opsec.eu>
	<4E5D0856.8080505@FreeBSD.org>
	<20110830163933.GC17573@lonesome.com>
	<CADLo838VNcjKLTTW2-420fs9cnP865WRXinqBTtP4sgu2Mttrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADLo838VNcjKLTTW2-420fs9cnP865WRXinqBTtP4sgu2Mttrg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/procmail Makefile
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:44:15 -0000

Am 30.08.2011 19:29, schrieb Chris Rees:
> On 30 August 2011 17:39, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:57:10PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
>>> How about if we added a new tag "OBSOLESCENT" or so that permits
>>> building the software only if it's already installed but refuses new
>>> installations?
>>
>> Right now if you set DEPRECATED you'll get a warning.  Shouldn't
>> that be sufficient without introducing a new mechanism that enforces
>> a policy?
> 
> +1
> 
> I agree-- isn't that what DEPRECATED is for??

It only warns, it does not prevent fresh installs on systems that don't
have the same port/package already installed.