Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 02:31:02 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: performance of jailed processes Message-ID: <xzp1xn9q2m1.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403301635390.43902-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:36:27 -0800 (PST)") References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403301635390.43902-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes: > > > If you plug 'YOUR_IP' with variations, does it change things? > > Aha! using the primary IP address works fine, but using one of the > > jail IPs does not. > ANY of them? > try the first added and the last added. do they have different delays? No noticeable difference. I get more variation from one run to another (about 10%) then I get from changing the IP address. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1xn9q2m1.fsf>