Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:09:26 +0200 From: Michael <michael@nettmail.de> To: Matt Douhan <matt@hasta.se> Cc: ROBERTO SIANO <rs@newmediaplan.it> Subject: Re: SV: ***SPAM*** HA cluster Message-ID: <40C9A0F6.9020700@nettmail.de> In-Reply-To: <BLEEIOPBIICNNGCFBBKOCEMBCAAA.matt@hasta.se> References: <BLEEIOPBIICNNGCFBBKOCEMBCAAA.matt@hasta.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, look at sgcluster, i think this is the right thing for you: http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ cul michael Matt Douhan wrote: >-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- >Fran: owner-freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org >Hi there >can you suggest a good HA solution based on freeBSD servers, like the >following. >Load balancing TCP+UDP on virtual ip + failover on the routers. > > > ( net ) > > | > | > | > ---------- > | switch | > ---------- > / \ > / \ > ---------- ---------- failover > | active backup > router | | router | > ---------- ---------- > load-balance \ / > \ VIP / > ---------- > | switch | > ---------- > / \ > / \ > ---------- ---------- > | server1 | | server2 | > ---------- ---------- > real servers > > > >This solution make no real sense, why have HA servers when you do not have >HA switches?, you are likely to set yourself up for disappointment is all, >use seperate switches as well in order to get a real HA solution. > >Also in order to give more accurate answer we would need to know what >applications/services you will be providing, there is a huge difference >between all TCP and only wanting HTTP/HTTPS failover and so on. > >regards > >Matt > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C9A0F6.9020700>