From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 16:40:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4C216A4D1 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C860D43D4C for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2EGe6J2036019 for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j2EGe6ij036018; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:06 GMT Message-Id: <200503141640.j2EGe6ij036018@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: ports/78774: Update net/libdnet 1.9 -> 1.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sergey Matveychuk List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/78774; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sergey Matveychuk To: Jonatan B Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock Subject: Re: ports/78774: Update net/libdnet 1.9 -> 1.10 Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:35:55 +0300 Jonatan B wrote: > Are you sure? IMO it seems hardly justified, because it will create > too many flavour-ports. Will changing it to rely only on WITH_PYTHON > (or WITHOUT_.., I don't care) be enough? > If you feel strongly about it, though, then I have no problem with > splitting this port. Yep. I like the idea much more too. -- Sem.