Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:00:03 -0800 From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006) Message-ID: <20051222210003.GF39174@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <43A53215.8090001@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <43A266E5.3080103@samsco.org> <20051217220021.GB93998@svcolo.com> <43A4A557.3010600@mac.com> <43A53215.8090001@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:55:33AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Doesn't creating a binary updates system that's going to be practical to use > require implementation of that old and exceedingly bikesheddable subject: > packaging up the base system? EXACTLY. That's why we need core team support. -- Jo Rhett senior geek SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051222210003.GF39174>