From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 9 19:15:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C1016A7DD for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [83.136.81.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71C0F43D46 for ; Tue, 9 May 2006 19:15:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 85822 invoked by uid 89); 9 May 2006 19:15:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kartoffel.salatschuessel.net) (83.136.81.185) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 9 May 2006 19:15:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 21:15:04 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060509211504.c84502cf.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <20060420092727.95884.qmail@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <20060420092727.95884.qmail@avocado.salatschuessel.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Xfce 4.4 Beta 1 (4.3.90.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 19:15:24 -0000 Hi, I just uploaded http://people.FreeBSD.org/~oliver/xfce/xfce4.4_ports_02.tar.bz2 Changes, thunar and orage are now requirements for xfce4, all the plugins which are converted to work with 4.4 are updated, and xfce4-desktop got an optional dependency to thunar (thats what I recall I've changed) Further xfce4 will now compile with FreeBSD 4 I've added several gcc 2.95 patches which I reported and are mostly committed upstream and be in-place in the next xfce4 or plugin release. While edwin@ is committing USE_REINPLACE cleanups it might be possible that the patch will broke a bit at some point of his cleanup. Make sure - if you've applied the 01 patch - to reverse the old applied patch first (with patch -R) before applying the 02 patch. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/