From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 3 17:39:53 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA16197 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 17:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br (root@cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.2.31]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA16186 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 17:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA01784 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Oct 1996 21:39:46 -0300 (EST) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199610040039.VAA01784@mailhost.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: More MBUFS, how ? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 3 Oct 1996 21:39:46 -0300 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL14 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, Is it possible to compile a kernel with a specially high quantity of mbufs, without messing with maxusers ? I want to use a machine with not so much memory as a router. Will it work to put just an options "NMBCLUSTERS=1024" in kernel config ? Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 ( Job ) jonny@cisi.coppe.ufrj.br Network Manager UFRJ/COPPE/CISI Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro