From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 18:47:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E8D1065670; Wed, 26 May 2010 18:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE92E8FC28; Wed, 26 May 2010 18:47:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws18 with SMTP id 18so3698524vws.13 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:47:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LTuebAI2l84JdqBbJhvkWAC0iHnzHHxL6qrWTEM6Ts=; b=ddZHW1uaFaMNYyNUcFTg7I1x9wOby5F1p4S0hY/sAgExZ9WDUI0Fp/tT+CfX5Cnpst GDYeVmnkgFpD9gy1CtEWchSPs5AIbA/WpvvNqURdy0ETrLgL3liM3k+zn9uwQ0uOVeC4 ZzXnMFBbveamFcoIfTr6ktudICdpCxdhNBPGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lUVaSevtgvEW6TetPfAnktzL2Zj3e6ubzt02d7658WzNiNLt/yzdAkSLNJmg5/iNgJ 2h5owt3zmOlb833W9diuvRM/9XXPQvN7pKyMqDt/mNSjtZhqMESwcZSM418XVIH5Vuwl XoK81u397IJeuxoe1m/4m92mNbFhhwzn7yf90= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.187.147 with SMTP id cw19mr2005732qcb.45.1274899653066; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.190.83 with HTTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 11:47:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201005251748.o4PHmI5T093246@svn.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:47:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Rob Farmer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Xin LI Subject: Re: svn commit: r208545 - in head/release: amd64 i386 ia64 pc98 powerpc sparc64 sun4v X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 18:47:34 -0000 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Rob Farmer wro= te: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Xin LI wrote: >> Author: delphij >> Date: Tue May 25 17:48:17 2010 >> New Revision: 208545 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208545 >> >> Log: >> =A0libarchive now needs libcrypto and liblzma. >> >> Modified: >> =A0head/release/amd64/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/i386/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/ia64/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/pc98/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/powerpc/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/sparc64/boot_crunch.conf >> =A0head/release/sun4v/boot_crunch.conf >> >> Modified: head/release/amd64/boot_crunch.conf >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D >> --- head/release/amd64/boot_crunch.conf Tue May 25 17:43:23 2010 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0(r208544) >> +++ head/release/amd64/boot_crunch.conf Tue May 25 17:48:17 2010 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0(r208545) >> @@ -39,6 +39,6 @@ progs ppp >> =A0progs sysinstall >> =A0progs usbconfig >> >> -libs -ll -ledit -lutil -lmd -lcrypt -lftpio -lz -lnetgraph >> +libs -ll -ledit -lutil -lmd -lcrypt -lcrypto -lftpio -lz -lnetgraph >> =A0libs -ldialog -lncurses -ldisk -lcam -lsbuf -lufs -ldevinfo >> -libs -lbsdxml -larchive -lbz2 -lusb -ljail >> +libs -lbsdxml -larchive -lbz2 -llzma -lusb -ljail >> > > Does the order of the libs entries matter? Because I just tried on > i386 after this commit and I still get errors related to the sha1, > md5, etc. functions but it worked fine with -llzma -lcrypto at the end > of the last line. In theory it shouldn't because the linker should be smart enough to evaluate the dependencies and link everything properly, but our copy of binutils isn't intelligent enough to determine the appropriate order from what I've seen. Thanks, -Garrett