From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Sep 14 7:14:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from eagle.phc.igs.net (ttyA0b.phc.igs.net [216.58.103.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDF315277 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:12:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eagle@phc.igs.net) Received: from localhost (eagle@localhost) by eagle.phc.igs.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA02801; Sat, 11 Sep 1999 05:21:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from eagle@phc.igs.net) X-Authentication-Warning: eagle.phc.igs.net: eagle owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 11 Sep 1999 05:20:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Garrett To: Michael Grommet Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: 2nd attempt: About: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-99:03.f tpd In-Reply-To: <7011ACE3864AD31183E50008C7FA081F01D4C1@ISIMAIN> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I would say no, as it isnt based on the wu-ftpd, source, that proftpd is rob On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Michael Grommet wrote: > I didnt get a single response, nor did I see it actually hit the group, so > here it is a 2nd time around > > is the default ftp daemon that installs with 2.2.8, and 3.* vulnerable to > this attack? > > The advisory didn't say one way or the other (to a degree that makes me > comfortable) > > > > -MG > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message