Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:15:19 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com> To: FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing Message-ID: <CAJ_iqtZwOgBOTr5-S7FDkXz2wwfN6=TPU8gzcPFfoq-D9FZtuA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52B343FE.4070808@FreeBSD.org> References: <52B0D149.5020308@marino.st> <52B343FE.4070808@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote: > > I sincerely disagree and think it's quite rude to users to not accept > their reports however they send them to us. current@ constantly has > build failures on it, even automated. There's no reason ports@ shouldn't > either. It tells everyone that "yes" there is a problem with this port > and "it's not just me". > We should accept reports from users - ack. However, there is nothing wrong with educating people about what, how and why when it comes to problems reports. If you accept anything, you will only end up with useless garbage. HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ_iqtZwOgBOTr5-S7FDkXz2wwfN6=TPU8gzcPFfoq-D9FZtuA>