From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 14:44:07 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E70106576D for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:44:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5448FC1A for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2543176wwf.31 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:44:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.17.202 with SMTP id j52mr528104wej.36.1297435445234; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:44:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.121.18 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 06:44:05 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [136.1.1.105] In-Reply-To: <4D5538DF.2050309@gmail.com> References: <4D547675.60506@ukr.net> <4D54D22F.2060607@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4D5531D3.8040906@ukr.net> <4D5538DF.2050309@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:44:05 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Be0WXLylId_juAca-c8Ujfr6NQE Message-ID: From: Nathan Vidican To: Guillermo Fernando Cotone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to add a few hundred ip on one interface? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:44:07 -0000 On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Guillermo Fernando Cotone < guillermo.cotone@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/11/2011 09:55 AM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > > And this construction work? > > > > ipv4_addrs_ed0="192.0.2.129/27 192.0.2.1-2/28 192.0.2.4-5/28" > > > It would work only if all the IPs were on the same subnet. If you want > to use different subnets you need to implement vlans on that interface > first. > > Regards, > Guillermo > > Implementing vlans makes an assumption that the network in question already does too. Though I agree, that in practice multiple subnets should not be on the same ethernet segment, it is not technically impossible. The correct response was quoted from the rc.conf manpage per the other response already sent. VLAN implementation is a whole different setup. -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com