From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 21 01:12:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAAB16A4CE; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:12:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from postman.arcor.de (postman2.arcor-online.net [151.189.0.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A357B43D1D; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:12:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-51-138.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.51.138]) (authenticated bits=0)i2L9Cfko004865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:12:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from [172.16.0.2] (helo=fillmore-labs.com) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1B4z0Y-000PHT-TL; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:12:38 +0100 Message-ID: <405D5C85.10706@fillmore-labs.com> Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:12:37 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier Organization: Fillmore Labs GmbH - http://www.fillmore-labs.com/ MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <405B9799.5000008@ciam.ru> <20040319184525.E85086@qbhto.arg> <405BB3D7.5090905@fillmore-labs.com> <405D0268.4070901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <405D0268.4070901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: "ports@freebsd.org" cc: Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: mozilla and bind X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 09:12:49 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>Since this may still overwrite the include files without changing the >>PKGNAME, >>it seems like a good idea to keep the build conflicts with bind8-base >>ports. >> >>Moreover we can run into problems if the port is installed with >>PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES, without PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8 and >>/usr/local/include is in the path. > > The version I committed this morning included defining > PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8 if PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES was > defined. For last night I wanted to get the user something to test, but > I do appreciate you bringing up this concern. Currently the problem the problem only shifted from people installing the port with PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8 to PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES, which will be admittedly less users. The commit does not really solve the problems. May I suggest one of the following: - issue a big, fat warning what problems will occur if the port is installed with PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES, including a way to restore the previous state in case of problems - add another PKGNAMESUFFIX, so that ports known to conflict with this installation could test for it Thanks Oliver