Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:00:34 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw: setsockopt failed Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970627105934.869s-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970626200931.701B-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Bernie Doehner wrote: > > > > ipfw add divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1 for example > > > > the system send me the message > > > > 00000 divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1 > > ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument > > via is a legal keyword? Yes. Man ipfw. You can say 'ipfw ... in via ed0' 'ipfw ... out via ed0' 'ipfw ... via ed0' (in or out)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970627105934.869s-100000>