From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 7 21:40:32 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA21332 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA21096 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 21:35:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0wwg21-00003A-00; Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:48:05 -0700 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 20:48:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: John-Mark Gurney cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AUTO_EOI_* ? In-Reply-To: <19970807194336.27057@hydrogen.nike.efn.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Tom Samplonius scribbled this message on Aug 7: > > > > It seems that the AUTO_EOI_* options might speed interupt handling. > > I've tried them on some motherboards, and they seem to work ok. Are these > > options recommended? I've seen some talk that these options should be > > eliminated? > > well... don't make AUTO_EOI_2 enabled by default... I have a motherboard > that dies when this option is enabled... though I haven't found one yet > when AUTO_EOI_1 is enabled... the comments say that AUTO_EOI_1 will > break suspend/resume on some notebooks... so it looks like we can't > enable both by default... Every motherboard I've tried it on works fine, even an old EISA 486 motherboard, but all the boards I tested were made by ASUS... > -- > John-Mark Gurney Modem/FAX: +1 541 683 6954 > Cu Networking > > Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD > > Tom