From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 5 19:34:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDFB16A417; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDF843D79; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:34:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=bsam.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GVYz1-000GcH-0x; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:34:15 +0400 Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GVZ0Y-000CmY-03; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:35:50 +0400 To: Geoff Buckingham References: <8753F8EA457BFF4A9707CADA143C8F6801ADD5C6@LONSMSXM04.emea.ime.reuters.com> <92580541@srv.sem.ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:35:49 +0400 In-Reply-To: <92580541@srv.sem.ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:33:54 +0400") Message-ID: <26500426@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: Boris Samorodov Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got a working rpm4.1 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 19:34:16 -0000 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:33:54 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:14:00 +0100 Geoff Buckingham wrote: > > Anyone got rpm 4.1 working natively on FreeBSD? (This seems to be when > > rpmts.h first appeared) > I tried to use it (archivers/rpm4) neally a year ago. Other than > database library names differ from those of rpm3 all worked as > expected. Though I switched back to rpm3 since our linux ports used > that version. Ouch, never mind, you asked about 4.1. That ports version has 4.0. WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve