From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 21 13:42:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5273E37B422 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 13:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from y3k@gti.net) Received: from apollo.gti.net (apollo.gti.net [199.171.27.7]) by apollo.gti.net (mail) with ESMTP id 82F70145A48; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:42:24 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary To: jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org From: y3k@gti.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: y3k@gti.net Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 20:42:24 GMT X-Mailer: EMUmail 2.70 Subject: Re: how much ram/cpu/swap to run emacs/xemacs effectively? Message-Id: <20010521204224.82F70145A48@apollo.gti.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Of course! C-h,c,C-SPC =>> "C-SPC runs the command set-mark-command" -mark On Mon, 21 May 2001 20:07:46 +0100 jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org wrote: > | Yes, well... nothing beats the power of M-{ , C-SPC , M-} , C-c C-c when > it > > Emacs has a binding for control-space ?!?! > > > > Jonathon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message