Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 11:07:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Billy Thompson <billy@idiom.com> To: Frank Pawlak <fpawlak@execpc.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD A Solution For Business Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980522110313.622A-100000@idiom.com> In-Reply-To: <980522043451.ZM3627@darkstar.connect.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think what is absolutely necessary to this would be a graph comparison between Win NT and FreeBSD. Start with a lite load then keep pushing it up until both systems are crawling. This would demostrate not only how reliable FreeBSD is on the SAME hardware, but also how much better it is (since I'm sure there will be obviously better performance from FreeBSD). Then plaster this on as many websites as you can and include it in the business solutions document. You know how much pointy haired bosses love graphs and charts, and this should show them in simple terms that FreeBSD has better preformance and is more reliable. -billy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980522110313.622A-100000>