Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:33 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Back to PR alpha/30486: broken floppy on DS10 Message-ID: <20050616223033.GA3008@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20050616215908.GA30350@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <6fca0ff7c7549bdc2e59ad813c82a72b@xcllnt.net> <20050616201046.GA29464@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20050616202857.GA2141@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20050616215908.GA30350@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:59:08PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:28:57PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote.. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:10:46PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > > Well, on my DS10 I still see the failure. Running a 'current' of May 25. > > > > > > Obvious difference: mine is a 600MHz, your's a 466MHz. > > > > Well, that's a start. Let's play with this for a bit. Can you > > try the attached patch? It helps if you boot verbose and watch > > out for fdc(4) related errors. > > No visible change. No fdc related errors on the console either. Didn't expect much, but I had to make sure. > Can you put a verbose dmesg.boot on your webpage? I'm sorta > suspicious that I might have a different fdc chip on my DS10. > </longshot> http://www.xcllnt.net/~marcel/machines/ds10/dmesg-verbose.txt There's 1 configuration difference between the verbose and non-verbose: I replaced the Matrox with the TGA. There's no difference between the fdc(4)'s that I can see. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050616223033.GA3008>