From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 16 22:30:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835F216A41C for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A92943D48 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost.xcllnt.net [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5GMUXFd003045; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5GMUXlO003044; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:30:33 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20050616223033.GA3008@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <6fca0ff7c7549bdc2e59ad813c82a72b@xcllnt.net> <20050616201046.GA29464@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20050616202857.GA2141@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20050616215908.GA30350@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050616215908.GA30350@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Back to PR alpha/30486: broken floppy on DS10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:30:37 -0000 On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 11:59:08PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:28:57PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote.. > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 10:10:46PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > > Well, on my DS10 I still see the failure. Running a 'current' of May 25. > > > > > > Obvious difference: mine is a 600MHz, your's a 466MHz. > > > > Well, that's a start. Let's play with this for a bit. Can you > > try the attached patch? It helps if you boot verbose and watch > > out for fdc(4) related errors. > > No visible change. No fdc related errors on the console either. Didn't expect much, but I had to make sure. > Can you put a verbose dmesg.boot on your webpage? I'm sorta > suspicious that I might have a different fdc chip on my DS10. > http://www.xcllnt.net/~marcel/machines/ds10/dmesg-verbose.txt There's 1 configuration difference between the verbose and non-verbose: I replaced the Matrox with the TGA. There's no difference between the fdc(4)'s that I can see. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net