Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 14:55:54 +0200 From: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ipfw table support for ipv6 Message-ID: <CAPS9%2BSsbpWJg2qZm4ZwT49c%2BFSKSCJwpaLUV9VukxHKzH00zWQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FF2DD35.9030209@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAPS9%2BStLWFb9m48PEJwzL-OHXYikyFQjt1ps4dqtY-BD3ra-JQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2D8A9.3010106@FreeBSD.org> <CAPS9%2BStQGosuyB5jg_KXhXBpgksVN0mg6KSxLJ-0tvHi70Wtbg@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2DD35.9030209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov <melifaro@freebsd.org > wrote: > On 03.07.2012 15:50, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov >> <melifaro@freebsd.org <mailto:melifaro@freebsd.org>> wrote: >> >> On 03.07.2012 15:32, Andreas Nilsson wrote: >> >> I just wondered what the status of table support for ipv6 in >> ipfw is? >> >> "working" >> >> And commited? On 9-stable from Jun 12 I cannot add an ipv6 to a table. >> > Yes, r234597 @ April 23. Probably you need to rebuild world to get ipfw > binary and manual page updated. (or simply rebuild ipfw binary which is > much faster). Well, June 12 is newer than April 23, but perhaps it was commited to 10-current and awaiting mfc to 9-stable (and hopefully 9.1)? > > >> man page for ipfw claims lookup tables are for 32-bit unsigned values. >> >> >> Best regards >> Andreas >> >> WBR, Alexander >> >> Best regards >> Andreas >> >> > > -- > WBR, Alexander > Best regards Andreas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BSsbpWJg2qZm4ZwT49c%2BFSKSCJwpaLUV9VukxHKzH00zWQ>