From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 12:32:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D165C7 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 12:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AFAE1D for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2013 12:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TrpOq-0003Gt-KZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:32:24 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.84.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:32:24 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 13:32:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: FB 9.1 boot loader problem in VirtualBox Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 07:31:53 -0500 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <50E963CD.3030709@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-84-117.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 12:32:14 -0000 jb wrote: [snip] > But I also could not ping: > $ ping -c 1 google.com > I have VM-Settings-Network > Attached to NAT > What is the correct setting here ? Vbox will not allow ping and/or traceroute type traffic through NAT. It states this somewhere in the docs. This normal to NAT. I've used both NAT and bridged and have more recently come around to believing that bridged is the better of the two. Especially when/if you wish to serve content to the outside world. Trying to monkey around with the port forwarding rules of the NAT setup is for the birds. -Mike