From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 22 09:58:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD5C106566B for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7BC8FC17 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 09:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz13 with SMTP id 13so6658211bwz.17 for ; Sun, 22 May 2011 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/wSz2SMDJwBKgzo8ExXX7ld3qea7nlOHDlmreJQBN/0=; b=lOE4oRrKRm7QTNYp2fV89794bHmxtOkZu9KSzAVKcYoQHyzl6TIE/QD6cqwdWUi4V+ HTLZ7SCNylJgAylLrR9Qj4AeiDjdn29UfTo+E7w7wUu4ngaICk0KAOVxofRtmbA3ga4i KuA+srbIiBYDv7PRzO9D2C7r6PPqxcQTe4rgY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=UEV2vfIzYftQC7lxmlWXo/ymi7VYjoY9TdKd6nBI0XSr3BAVKAh0N4VRbiC2OffPlv sDGLXdJPqKG6Oh1UWdsED5/IuBJYNpeNzT2WL5JR8gTejd0nV2uTUSlL3LCdK7RFFOJW oFOhn2eaN02sd0OovbeIq9ibqFwzU7vJ1/c3o= Received: by 10.204.16.140 with SMTP id o12mr1137606bka.125.1306058307134; Sun, 22 May 2011 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.65.198 with HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2011 02:57:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DD8D55E.10507@webrz.net> References: <4DD8D55E.10507@webrz.net> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 10:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jos Chrispijn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl | Frequent update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 09:58:28 -0000 On 22 May 2011 10:20, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Is there a reason why Perl is updated so frequently these days? > Would it be better to keep m version-1 in order to see the latest one being > stable for at least three months? > > regards, > Jos Chrispijn What's the point? Even minor versions of perl are stable, and odd numbers are the development branches -- rather like the kernel of That Other Less-Free OS. It's updated frequently because it's being worked upon by such a large development team now -- it's progress! Chris