Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:49:37 +1000 From: Mikhail Goriachev <mikhailg@webanoide.org> To: corwin@aeternal.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail system Suggestions Message-ID: <44C586C1.1090704@webanoide.org> In-Reply-To: <44C50565.2030505@aeternal.net> References: <20060722054711.9B5B.GERARD@seibercom.net> <005601c6ad8c$81193f60$0200a8c0@satellite> <a25afc300607221305o826052erf445fd177a55795c@mail.gmail.com> <44C31024.6070002@webanoide.org> <20060723082433.0f15744d.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <44C4FD95.8080308@webanoide.org> <44C50565.2030505@aeternal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Martin Hudec wrote: > You can give dovecot a try now :), I use it on all mailservers in > production environments. It handles my ~54k mails in my mail account > pretty well (only slowdown is detected if I use gprs connection ~56kbits). > > One good thing that counts in for dovecot is that postfix in its current > 2.3.x line is able to do smtp authentication directly via dovecot (so no > use for sasl* packages) to any backend you use (mysql, ldap etc.) in > your dovecot config. Nice and clean. More info: > http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html#server_dovecot > > Dovecot with its 1.0 version is pretty stable now, I have been using it > since 0.99.x versions (now alpha port is in use, upgrade to beta is > planned). > > Courier-imap is good choice too, I have no objections to it, but my one > subjective one perhaps: in its older versions (3.0.x) it seemed to have > some kind of psychic problems when dealing with Thunderbird mailclients. > Then I switched to Dovecot. Thanks for the info. Cheers, Mikhail. -- Mikhail Goriachev Webanoide Telephone: +61 (0)3 62252501 Mobile Phone: +61 (0)4 38255158 E-Mail: mikhailg@webanoide.org Web: http://www.webanoide.org PGP Key ID: 0x4E148A3B PGP Key Fingerprint: D96B 7C14 79A5 8824 B99D 9562 F50E 2F5D 4E14 8A3B
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44C586C1.1090704>