Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:31:27 +0100 From: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> Cc: Radovan Gibala <gigi@agraf.sk>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MySQL and BerkleyDB Message-ID: <20010123213126.A46311@physik.TU-Berlin.DE> In-Reply-To: <20010123144920.I2376@ringworld.oblivion.bg>; from roam@orbitel.bg on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:49:20PM %2B0200 References: <3A6C158C.7F8794B1@agraf.sk> <20010122185314.D5657@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010123144920.I2376@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 02:49:20PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:12:12PM +0100, Radovan Gibala wrote: > > > Is there any possibility to get a port for MySQL with BerkleyDB support > > > ? > > > I realy need the transaction support and I'd like to build MySQL from a > > > port. > > > > I'm currently working on a patch to the MySQL port to allow specifying > > charsets (the --with-charset and --with-extra-charsets configure script > > options). I'll throw in Berkeley DB there for good measure. Expect > > patches tomorrow, and hopefully, if they do not screw up things very > > badly, Dirk may include them sometime soon :) > > OK, here's the patch as promised. WITH_CHARSET=charset defines the > primary charset (Latin-1 is the MySQL default), WITH_XCHARSET=list > defines the other compiled-in charsets (may be 'all'), and WITH_BDB=yes > (or simply -DWITH_BDB) compiles in Berkeley DB support. > > You'd need the patch Dirk posted for the databases/db3 port. > > Hmm. A question to Dirk: The configure script needed to be patched > to look for libdb3.so instead of libdb.so (-ldb3). I could have > patched aclocal.m4, then specified USE_AUTOCONF and called aclocal; > I chose to run a Perl regex on the configure script itself. This is > cheaper, and less error-prone for this particular MySQL version; it is, > however, more error-prone for future MySQL versions, where this blind > replacement could garble something else. How do you feel about it? I decided to include BDB as part of the mysql build. So the patching -ldb -> -ldb3 isn't neccessary any longer. (But I would have included it in patch-ag... 8-) Is there any reason why you made the BDB part optional? I'd like to include it generally. Regards Dirk -- Dirk Froemberg FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010123213126.A46311>