Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:55:10 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org, K?vesd?n G?bor <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Audit integration into CVS in progress, some tree disruption Message-ID: <43E1586E.6090203@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060202004044.GA99245@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060201221213.L87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E134AB.8000600@t-hosting.hu> <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E14C53.3060400@rogers.com> <20060202004044.GA99245@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 07:03:31PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: > >> Personally, i would like to see less "experimental" code in 6.1. Perhaps >> it would be better to wait until everyone feels the code is ready? >> > > Why do you care if code that is not enabled by default is present in > the system? :-) > > Kris > Well... While you, me, and other viewers of this list may be fully aware of the situation, some else who is either new to FreeBSD or missed out on this info may try it and possibly be disappointed. Which would ruin their experience and/or opinion of FreeBSD in general. I guess if it does make it in, it would be a good idea to clearly notify the user that it is still experimental, etc..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E1586E.6090203>