From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 03:02:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B129106564A for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [192.147.25.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C6C8FC18 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org ([192.147.25.65]:61475) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LC3it-0001Vd-9q; Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:02:20 -0600 Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:02:17 -0600 (CST) From: Larry Rosenman To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <4945BF21.7080406@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <004901c95a1c$5c6b2680$15417380$@org> <493ECA0D.7090901@andric.com> <4945BF21.7080406@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-LERCTR-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-4.4/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8,BAYES_00=-2.599 X-LERCTR-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-4.4/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8,BAYES_00=-2.599 DomainKey-Status: no signature Cc: Dimitry Andric , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Eygene Ryabinkin Subject: Re: Why does host and dig show a ; as \;? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 03:02:22 -0000 On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Doug Barton wrote: > > I've never come across this, but if I had to guess I'd say that it does > so for maximum compatibility with a wide variety of DNS software. > Remember the robustness principle, "liberal in what you accept, > conservative in what you send." I'm just surprised it prints it that way, but the actual DNS responses do *NOT* contain the escaping. It was a surprise, at least to me, while trying to verify the RR's. Turns out the real problem was unrelated, but this still surprised me. > > hth, > > Doug > > > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893