Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:00:04 +0100 From: Raphael Eiselstein <rabe@uugrn.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Using just db44 for all instead of mixed usage of db41/db42/db44 (was: Re: mutt vs db44 // Bug in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk ?) Message-ID: <20130215230004.GB4056@ma.sigsys.de> In-Reply-To: <20130209131330.GF4018@ma.sigsys.de> References: <20130208201503.GB4018@ma.sigsys.de> <20130208220108.GC4018@ma.sigsys.de> <86ehgpabwi.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> <20130209131330.GF4018@ma.sigsys.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Just to get an answer to this thread: On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Raphael Eiselstein wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:51:09PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > # <UNIQUENAME>_WITH_BDB_VER > > in /etc/make.conf? > havn't tried yet. But for me it makes more sens to pin all ports to the > *same* version of BDB.=20 I set WITH_BDB_HIGHEST=3Dx in my /etc/make.conf of the build-jail.=20 *All* packages depending on db4x will be linked to db44 now, as this is the highest version. I haven't test all binaries "in depth" but different build runds were fine= =20 for the last couple of days and I didn't see any problems yet (libchk ...) > Is there any problem linking db44 to *any* port?=20 I didn't see some, but ... ? > Why do we have so much versions of bdb in our ports?=20 I guess there must be technical reasons for this. Can anyone explain? Where are the differneces between db41, db42 and db44? Why not just shipping db44 or higher? Regards Raphael --=20 Raphael Eiselstein <rabe@uugrn.org> http://rabe.uugrn.org/ xmpp:freibyter@gmx.de | https://www.xing.com/profile/Raphael_Eiselstein = =20 GnuPG: E7B2 1D66 3AF2 EDC7 9828 6D7A 9CDA 3E7B 10CA 9F2D =2E........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.........|.. --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEevfQACgkQnNo+exDKny2Y0ACfWrLoOzEAWfGmQpg/b2zRdkyq AmwAnj9VeWjjzbNg91x1Q8CNS+/y0Tel =a4Bf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130215230004.GB4056>