From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 02:31:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0614B16A4BF for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 02:31:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C356543F75 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 02:31:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5985765410; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:31:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 37691-01-9; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:31:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-18-81.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.18.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2951365322; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:31:45 +0100 (BST) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8A76143; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:31:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:31:39 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: John Reynolds Message-ID: <20031015093139.GF1125@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <16266.165.855721.885956@whale.home-net> <20031013041808.GA33468@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20031013073935.B6508@newtrinity.zeist.de> <16266.39443.651696.361978@whale.home-net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16266.39443.651696.361978@whale.home-net> cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Marius Strobl Subject: Re: panic with cdrecord -- anybody else seeing this? [backtrace obtained] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:31:54 -0000 On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 05:26:59AM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > Thanks. I haven't tried cdrtools-devel in "a while" so I probably didn't see > the work-around that was committed. I will try it and report back as to if it > works (to further narrow down the mlockall(2) bit....). It looks like alc@ has fixed the problem in vm_fault.c rev 1.181. BMS