From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 16 23:21:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC5416A400 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B3313C455 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2GN9Uuk017149; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:09:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Christian Brueffer Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:09:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200703161256.23996.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070316224222.GD1926@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> In-Reply-To: <20070316224222.GD1926@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200703161909.27843.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2853/Fri Mar 16 15:48:54 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] ACPI-CA 20070126 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:21:41 -0000 On Friday 16 March 2007 06:42 pm, Christian Brueffer wrote: > I get the following on boot on my T41p, which is a lot more verbose > than it used to be. Is this the new default or will it be turned > off once the code hits the tree? ------ >8 --- SNIP!!! --- >8 --- Yes and no. In fact, those are printed out from ACPI-CA itself and there is no option to turn it off. :-( > Apart from that I haven't seen any regressions so far. Great. Thanks for the report, Jung-uk Kim