From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Nov 18 12:23:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D44C4870B for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp1.irishbroadband.ie (smtp1.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F88E38D; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from [89.127.62.20] (helo=smtp.lan.sohara.org) by smtp1.irishbroadband.ie with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1c7hxK-0002Dz-2f; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1c7hxp-000JaP-6s; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:08:17 +0000 Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:40 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microsoft announced it is joining The Linux Foundation? Message-Id: <20161118120740.cbaf9f31a85b2b19211f5d82@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <747a871c-4d34-7c06-0c04-4650f31bb6ce@FreeBSD.org> References: <20161118113224.20964d7d.freebsd@edvax.de> <747a871c-4d34-7c06-0c04-4650f31bb6ce@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:23:32 -0000 On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:44:07 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Microsoft in its aspect as the global cloud computing company is really > quite different from Microsoft in its aspect as the PC desktop operating > system company. Yes instead of trying to ensure that every computer you can buy runs Windows, that every corporate email system runs on Exchange etc. and everybody has to pay to stay up to date, they want to ensure that as much of your data as possible lives on their servers so you have to keep paying to get at it with rented applications. It's still a lock-in strategy. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith