From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 24 19:48:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655B0986 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1681253 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0OJlsvx000340; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:47:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52E2C36A.3070306@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:47:54 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: coretemp0: critical temperature detected, suggest system shutdown References: <20140123223803.3b02c179@X220.alogt.com> <52E1731A.1020005@dreamchaser.org> <20140124204523.5ff8e368@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140124204523.5ff8e368@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 24 Jan 2014 12:47:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 19:48:03 -0000 On 01/24/14 05:45, Erich Dollansky wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:52:58 -0700 > Gary Aitken wrote: >> On 01/23/14 07:38, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> >>> I have seen today for the first time above's message in messages. >>> >>> This happened when I compiled some ports. It is normal that the CPU >>> get then some 96 degrees. >> >> I had this problem some time ago. >> I ended up replacing the stock fan on my system with a better one. >> However, a good cleaning of the system may remove enough dust, >> cobwebs, etc. and promote better airflow and thereby solve the >> problem. > > this is not the problem. The machine has still the same temperatures as > at the beginning. Only the message appeared with the update. > > It was always normal that the CPU went up to 96 Celsius the moment I was > compiling the kernel or some larger ports. It does not get hotter now. Sorry, I misunderstood the original question. Unfortunately, I can't help you there.