From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 12 07:35:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6453516A473 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 92C5113C4F0 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 5642 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2008 07:35:09 -0000 Received: from adsl246.dyn234.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.234.246) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 12 Feb 2008 07:35:08 -0000 Message-ID: <47B14C06.2020101@pacific.net.sg> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:34:30 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47AFC80B.8090303@gmail.com> <20080211211052.X5691@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47B0AF73.6030901@chuckr.org> <200802112304.09906.jonathan+freebsd-questions@hst.org.za> <20080211211428.GA50577@aleph.cepheid.org> <20080211223155.C6199@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47B0CDA1.9060801@student.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <47B0CDA1.9060801@student.utwente.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: what happened to linuxflashplugin? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 07:35:12 -0000 Hi, just send them an e-mail telling them that you are so sorry about the quality of their website that you have to buy somewhere else. Do not send this to the webmaster, send it to the sales department. Those people fight for the clients and give a shit on technology. Erich Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > Wojciech Puchar cut a corner: > >> but there are sites that you can't do anything without flash, as even >> navigation requires this. > > True. > >> this is just example of crap-design, > > I agree. Although I don't think everybody will. > >> and i simply don't view them.. > > I'm afraid it's not that simple. Counterexample: > > When I was shopping for a new parachute rig, one of the manufacturers I was > interested in turned out to have a Flash-only website. I could of course > have decided not to buy there because their website sucks, but when it > comes to equipment that's supposed to be going to save my life hundreds of > times I'd much rather base the decision on the quality of the product than > on the technical soundness of a website, thank you :-) > > I don't mean to ridicule your principles, I merely mean to point out that > in my opinion it's not always as black and white as you make it seem. > > Alphons >