From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Apr 2 15:37:35 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA14835 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 15:37:35 -0700 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (root@palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA14826 for ; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 15:37:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA03597 ; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 23:35:14 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: -Vince- cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /etc/printcap for Deskjet 500 and gs In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 02 Apr 1995 18:30:27 EDT." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3593.796862111.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Sun, 02 Apr 1995 23:35:11 +0100 Message-ID: <3594.796862111@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [gratituously moved from -hackers - Gary] In message , -Vince- writes: > That would be neat.... netpbm doesn't have like the giftoppm and >the other ppm stuff that pbmplus has... Also, the dvips and the TeX in >the FreeBSD ports collection is broken in that dvips can't create fonts >while running in the background... Did you report the problems with the TeX stuff? I don't remember hearing anything about it! And is there any reason for having netpbm but not pbmplus? Gary