Date: Fri, 26 Nov 1999 09:16:14 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <winter@jurai.net> Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3c509b getting `eeprom failed to come ready' in current Message-ID: <2776.943604174@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Nov 1999 00:07:54 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911260006540.7305-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.20.9911260006540.7305-100000@sasami.jurai.net>, "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: >Yes, and when I converted if_ep to newbus I mentioned that hardwire was no >longer supported. Couldn't we simply ignore such hardwiring (with a warning) if present ? >I'm a little annoyed that if_ep has issues working with if_ex/if_ie and >I'll add that to my list of things to look at when I get a chance to fix a >few outstanding issues with if_ep. Can we somehow mark the if_ep as "fickle hardware" so it gets probed before the if_ex/it_ie ? We used to have such a facility. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2776.943604174>