Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:14:24 +0000 From: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: Zeus Panchenko <zeus@ibs.dn.ua> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why no automount for one zfs? Message-ID: <5458A700.1000700@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141104114540.94096@smtp.new-ukraine.org> References: <20141104072923.79140@smtp.new-ukraine.org> <54589780.7020303@multiplay.co.uk> <20141104111704.91939@smtp.new-ukraine.org> <54589CB2.5090105@multiplay.co.uk> <20141104114540.94096@smtp.new-ukraine.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/11/2014 09:45, Zeus Panchenko wrote: > Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 04/11/2014 09:17, Zeus Panchenko wrote: >>> Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Missing zfs_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf? >>> no, it is on it's place (I run root-on-zfs) >>> >> Add it, > the option *is* in /etc/rc.conf, otherwise I couldn't boot since I run > root-on-zfs > >> cat /etc/rc.conf > ---[ quotation start ]------------------------------------------- > #-*- conf -*- > # > zfs_enable="YES" > ... > ---[ quotation end ]------------------------------------------- > > >> it will fix you mounting issue. > the problem exists only for this single fs, all other fs are automounted > correctly Sorry lost in translation a bit there ;-) So when you boot and its missing the one volume what happens when you run: zfs mount -a Does that mount the missing volume?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5458A700.1000700>