From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 02:35:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD1616A41F; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ikob@koganei.wide.ad.jp) Received: from ns.koganei.wide.ad.jp (ns.koganei.wide.ad.jp [202.249.37.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2344443D45; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:35:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ikob@koganei.wide.ad.jp) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (235.pool7.dsl24mtokyo.att.ne.jp [165.76.174.235]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns.koganei.wide.ad.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9F2ZtRR036190; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:35:56 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ikob@koganei.wide.ad.jp) In-Reply-To: <2b22951e0510141758x1edef8jf7caf2514c336514@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b22951e0510141758x1edef8jf7caf2514c336514@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v734) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Katsushi Kobayashi Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:35:55 +0900 To: "Cai, Quanqing" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Tai-hwa Liang , freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fwe -> fwip in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:35:59 -0000 Hi, Although I don't know the detail of fwe technology, I understand the technology is a proprietary one. It is better to provide a compatibility with RFC standard firewire over IP, if some volunteer are there. On 2005/10/15, at 9:58, Cai, Quanqing wrote: > Hi guys, > > When I was fixing bug kern/82727: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/82727, I found we use > fwe(Ethernet over FireWire) in GENERIC kernel, not fwip(IP over > FireWire). > But we all know that IP over FireWire is more widely used on other > OSes, and > now this bug is fixed, do we need change fwe to fwip? > > I talked it with Tai-hwa Liang, he agrees with me. But he suggests > me to > post here for more advices, since there might be some > considerations such > like backward compatibility or code size that makes re@ made this > decision. > > Please give you advice or opinion. > > Best > Cai, Quanqing > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >