Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 23:10:29 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: dg@root.com Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernfs/procfs questions... Message-ID: <199806050510.XAA07054@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199806050357.UAA04724@implode.root.com> References: <199806042332.RAA05525@mt.sri.com> <199806050357.UAA04724@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I think of sysctl as a bunch of big global variable, or OPTIONS in the > >kernel config file. If it isn't documented, it isn't needed. > > That's just being silly and you know it. How is it any different? Some of the sysctl parameters are things that were once options, so I'm being factual. > >Do I have permission to start removing sysctl's that aren't > >documented/used? > > You're welcome to remove them from your own sources, but commiting those > changes is a real good way to lose your commit privileges. Thanks for the threat. I ask for permission and get spanked. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806050510.XAA07054>