Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Jan 2001 05:32:59 +0900
From:      FUJISHIMA Satsuki <sf@FreeBSD.org>
To:        jstocker@tzi.de
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Jan Stocker <Jan.Stocker@t-online.de>
Subject:   Re: Problem Report ports/23401
Message-ID:  <867l3mt3es.wl@cheerful.com>
In-Reply-To: <000001c08573$327474c0$0101000a@twoflower>
References:  <000001c08573$327474c0$0101000a@twoflower>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
At Tue, 23 Jan 2001 20:32:17 +0100,
Jan Stocker wrote:
> Is there anything wrong with it?
> Any other way to commit new ports?

I think:
o There are too many nethack-blah ports separately maintained.
o They are too similar and mostly duplicated.
o So they are easily master-slaved (IMO).

As the first step, I made patches to make nethack and nethack-gtk
master-slaved and sent to maintainer and waiting for reply.

Yes, I think your GNOME version should be come into this family.

-- 
FUJISHIMA Satsuki


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867l3mt3es.wl>