Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Dec 2006 08:27:59 +0200
From:      Ian FREISLICH <if@hetzner.co.za>
To:        Looza <elias_nogueira@hotmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: problem simulating a LFN 
Message-ID:  <E1GwByh-0000mz-KP@hetzner.co.za>
In-Reply-To: Message from Looza <elias_nogueira@hotmail.com>  of "Sun, 17 Dec 2006 17:31:53 PST." <7922408.post@talk.nabble.com> 

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Looza wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to simulate a LFN(Long Fat Network) to test various TCP versions.
> I am using iperf on the end PCs. I'm trying to use FreeBSD's ipfw to
> simulate a LFN.
> ex. throughput=1 Gbit/s and delay=100ms, trhoughput=100 Mbit/s and delay=1s
> 
> This is how my hardware is connected.
> 
> |Linux PC|--Gigabit--| FreeBSD box |--Gigabit--|Linux PC|
> 
> 
> With this configuration:
> 
> >ipfw 500 add allow ip from any to any
>
> I get speeds of about 200 to 300 Mbit/s and the CPU usage goes up
> to 99%.  I've googled this problem and it seems that some good
> quality NIC do most of the processing so that the CPU doesn't have
> to. Unfortunately I have bad quality NICs so the CPU does all the
> processing, stoping the throughput at these speeds.

Try sysctl net.inet.ip.fastforwarding=1 .  With this set I can
formard and filter in excess of 500kpps using less than 5% CPU on
a Xeon.

I highly recomend the Intel 82546GB chip based adaptors (em driver).

Ian

--
Ian Freislich



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1GwByh-0000mz-KP>