From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 10 11:10:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BC316A412; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iedowse@iedowse.com) Received: from nowhere.iedowse.com (nowhere.iedowse.com [82.195.144.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C15443D46; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iedowse@iedowse.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=iedowse.com) by nowhere.iedowse.com via local-iedowse id ; 10 Nov 2006 11:09:58 +0000 (GMT) To: Hans Petter Selasky In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:57:17 +0100." <200611101157.19387.hselasky@c2i.net> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:09:57 +0000 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200611101109.aa29582@nowhere.iedowse.com> Cc: freebsd-stable , Maxim Konovalov , Alex Rodin , David Coder , freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb to serial X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:10:00 -0000 In message <200611101157.19387.hselasky@c2i.net>, Hans Petter Selasky writes: >On Friday 10 November 2006 10:08, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> The second question: is it OK to commit uark(4) as is and then convert >> it to the new model? > >I would prefer no. It is better to commit "uark(4)" to the USB p4 project, >than HEAD, because then we don't have to worry about integrating the driver. If the driver works, then there should be no need to hold off on committing it to -CURRENT. Having it in -CURRENT now allows it to be MFC'd to RELENG_6 sooner. From a quick glance it looks fine to me, so I'd say just go ahead and commit it Maxim. Ian