From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 8 12:19:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DE61562E; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:10:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA40896; Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:10:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) From: Steve Kargl Message-Id: <199912082010.MAA40896@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Reaping error(1) In-Reply-To: from Kris Kennaway at "Dec 8, 1999 09:50:35 am" To: kris@hub.freebsd.org (Kris Kennaway) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 12:10:26 -0800 (PST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I'd also like to rip out fsplit into ports (the code is disgusting and > was probably written by a FORTRAN programmer and/or using f2c :) but then > I'd draw fire from the "people who know someone who uses FORTRAN" crowd. > I was going to fix fsplit. Yes, I program in Fortran (note the proper spelling of Fortran). No, I don't use fsplit. We might also want to remove fpr(1). It should be noted that both fsplit and fpr apply to legacy Fortran 77 code (and older). Neither utility can deal with Fortran 90 or Fortran 95. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message