Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Aug 1999 19:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>
To:        Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>
Cc:        committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: linux_base
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908061932370.45391-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990806192008.F11290@mad>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:09:48PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> > For those who thought I was on crack when I said linux_base
> > was broken I'd encourage you to go visit:
> > 
> > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/4-latest/linux_base-5.2.log
> 
> Now we know you're on crack.  ;-)
> 
> Read farther down the disclaimer on /errorlogs/.
> 
> The linux_base has never worked for the -current package build sweep.
> This isn't a problem and has been deemed acceptable.  Until Satoshi
> decides to split his (eight?) machines between running -current and
> running -stable, such problems will probably always exist.

I can reproduce the exact same error just trying a port build.

We now don't support -CURRENT?

-- 
- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp -
- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org  -



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9908061932370.45391-100000>